Forum Header
Register   Login ..:: Community » Forums ::.. Friday, May 18, 2012
 Jericho Forums Minimize

Please Note: The Google Chrome browser does not currently allow posting on this forum. We will try to fix this ASAP.
Subject: Projects: Site and Forum Policies.
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
sgMarshallUser is Offline

Forum Admin
JK Website Admin

Posts:446


10/07/2007 10:09 AM  
Needed: person or persons to look at various websites for lists of policies we might want to adopt.

I posted the below in a message. This is where my head is at on the subject.

As for policies, off the top of my head (of the above) Delete Topic and Delete Post should not be used. Instead posts in violation should be moved to the Forum Post Holding Cell.

Posts can be edited to fix issues which affect the website as a whole. Example: editing a post which expands the width of the forum page.

No personal attacks. You can criticize ideas (constructively).

Attempting to bypass the bad language filter by changing/scrambling/abbreviating the word or words used may be considered as if one spelt out the word or words.
airassault101User is Offline

Posts:321


10/07/2007 1:40 PM  
here is a mod policy for another site I am a Mod for. Some of it may be useful for us. Its an old policy and hasn't been updated in awhile but its a good base.

Net Benefits
Administration and Moderation Policy

Net Benefits was designed as a forum for active and free discussion of debate, current events, life, and random fun things that build a community. It is in the interest of maintaining this intent that this policy is to be constructed. The intent is not to freeze or silence speech, but to maintain a sense of order out of anarchy. With this in mind, there will be two levels of moderation at Net Benefits.

Administrators

These members will be appointed. Their responsibilities are primarily relegated to site maintenance. This includes site formatting, moving threads to appropriate forums, splitting dual topic threads into separate threads, merging topics, deleting double posts, deleting spam, etc. Administrators are not responsible for content control, except in cases where moderators challenged. Please to not ask them to control content.

Moderators

Description and Duties
Moderators will have jurisdiction in specific forums and will be elected. There will be two moderators per major forum, and any person may be a moderator in multiple forums. Moderators will have limited responsibility and power. Specific moderator tasks will be apportioned in accord with platforms written by the moderators themselves and posted for the election. They will be empowered only to lock threads and, in rare cases to move threads that they think should not be on the forum into a special sub-forum to be reviewed by an Administrator. Standards for removal will be very high, and should almost never happen. Net Benefits is a free speech zone; it is not appropriate to censor ideas that are unpopular, or methods of arguing that are not pleasant.

Elections
Moderators will be elected for 1-year terms and may be elected to unlimited consecutive terms. Elections will be handled by private messaging on the site. All voters must have at least 10 posts, and been registered for at least 1 month before the beginning of balloting.

Display of Moderator Platforms
Moderators that are elected will post their winning platforms in a single thread in the Site Ideas and Feedback forum. This thread will be called "Moderator Policies XXXX-XXXX" where the XXXX-XXXX represents the year range of the moderation.

Impeachment
Moderators may be impeached if at least 10 users whose total post counts add up to at least 5000 posts call for it. Impeachment must achieve a simple majority of votes cast. All voters must have at least 10 posts, and been registered for at least 1 month before the start of balloting.

Public Override
Moderator decisions may be over-ridden by users. If at least 5 users whose total posts counts add up to at least 3000 posts want a moderator decision changed, they may post an appeal and either the moderator or an administrator will unlock it.

Admin Override
Moderators may also be overruled by a half or majority vote on the part of the Administrators.

Special Moderation for Tisias and Corax

These accounts were not designed for anonymous character assassination. Moderators and Administrators will be empowered to move posts by Tisias and Corax to the moderation forum on the basis of content. The standard for these two accounts is unique; speech made using these accounts is not protected at the same standard as posts made by any other accounts. Users are not prevented from creating their own anonymous accounts and using them. The intention here is to prevent the misuse of these accounts from rendering them useless (if people stop reading them because they are so frequently malicious personal attacks, they won't get read when they are used for more pressing concerns).

Use of Real Names

Because some people are concerned about using their real names on this site, personally identifying information should only be used with permission. Personally identifying information is defined as last names, phone numbers, social security numbers, financial information as well as home and work addresses. Permission to use such information may be granted by putting the information in a user profile, user title, account name or signature block. Users may request that moderators edit messages to remove personally identifying information that they have not given permission to be posted publicly. If moderators fail to comply with this request, users may ask admins to do it. Such edits may ONLY remove personally identifying information, all other message content should be left intact.


"Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
--Ronald Reagan
sgMarshallUser is Offline

Forum Admin
JK Website Admin

Posts:446


10/08/2007 3:22 AM  
It is usually the case that you can tell the situations a group has faced by reading their rules. Thanks for the post.
FiZzBaWUser is Offline

Posts:61


10/09/2007 9:20 PM  
For now I will post a link to the rules that we have at Helpingteens.org, which is the teen help site that I am an administrator at. If you want to take a look feel free. I am going to comb through the rules and take out the ones that we obviously won't need to use on JKI since this site is not focused on teens, and post the rules I think we should adopt in a later post in this thread.

http://www.helpingteens.org/sgrules.html

-FiZz


Join "I helped save Jericho!" on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2592225324
sgMarshallUser is Offline

Forum Admin
JK Website Admin

Posts:446


10/09/2007 11:47 PM  

Sounds great. I'm looking forward to seeing them.

FiZzBaWUser is Offline

Posts:61


10/11/2007 11:04 AM  
Going through the HT rules, I decided to make a list of possible issues that we may need to address here at JKI, instead of listing the rules we use at HT, since they will obviously need to be worded different and applied differently. I am more than willing to word rules, once the issues that we want to address are agreed upon.

Possible issues that need to be addressed:

1) Require a valid email address
2) Limit the number of user accounts per person
3) "password sharing" / Account hijacking.
4) Respect of others and their opinions
5) Excessive CAPS
6) Moderator "begging" / pestering
7) Spamming
8) The allowed size of posted images/files
9) Provide a process for dealing with member disputes of post moderation
10) Express the right of JKI to remove posts it determines to be harmful to the community at its own discretion.
11) Harassment

I have access to the actual rules that we used to address these issues, and could easily modify them to apply here. But I am not sure if I am in that position. I think we need a formal agreement, by the board I assume, before anything is actually formulated. Regardless, I hope the above gets us on the right track.

-FiZz


Join "I helped save Jericho!" on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2592225324
sgMarshallUser is Offline

Forum Admin
JK Website Admin

Posts:446


10/13/2007 1:42 PM  

I decided to do the first pass at the rules, since it seemed to me that people agreeing to be moderators should at least have a sense of what they’re getting into and more importantly how we may differ than the types of forums they’re used to. Since we’ll be stressing community, our forum will have a slightly different flavor than most.

When I put the first draft up, take a look and we(all currently registered) can discuss ones we have issues with.

I may let slide a few certain specific rules until an actual need for them arises. This would be so we can see how the community generally reacts before impose restrictions.

As to the points you raised:
1) Require a valid email address
Valid emails are required by software unless I give someone a pass (like when I generated the passwords by hand). While passwords can stop being valid and while I can see that it can be beneficial should members maintain them. I am not sure that we need an actual rule. I realize this is a common forum rule. I guess I am looking for a good reason why it needs to be a rule rather than a suggestion.
2) Limit the number of user accounts per person
My personal feeling is that the problem is not having multiple accounts, but how those accounts may get used. I am not sure why I should care if someone wants 10 accounts. I might care that someone is pretending to be different people to generate false support for their position. But it seems to me rather than banning multiple accounts, when there can be legitimate reasons for having multiple accounts, it might be better to just have rules banning the misuse of multiple accounts.
3) "password sharing" / Account hijacking.
I am more on the fence about the next one and can go either way. I think this is another one of those ‘advise them of the risk’ and lock the account if it gets out of hand issues. If a husband and wife want to share an account, I don’t have too much of an issue with that. It might be pointed out that it is on them to explain who is posting and that any confusion is something they simply have to deal with themselves. I think most the problems which I can see with password issues might be already covered in the more general rules about using the site.
Respect of others and their opinions
Respect of others sure. Respect of other’s opinions, more shaky and I am unsure what that even means. If someone says in their opinion 2 + 2 = 5, what does respecting an opinion mean? As long as the people aren’t personally attacking each other, I am of the mind that opinions are fair game. Though some of this is implicitly covered when the guidelines talk about being a good ‘citizen’ and community building.
Excessive CAPS
Should be a rule. Should be policed liberally though.
Moderator "begging" / pestering
Can you give some examples? I am also wondering if setting up separate moderator accounts would avoid much of that.
Spamming
Some controls needed.
 
[qutoe] The allowed size of posted images/files
 
Agreed.
Provide a process for dealing with member disputes of post moderation
Yes. It will have to avoid dealing with individual moderators and we’ll need to make it clear that people can question policy or the application of a policy, but that they have to do so separately.
 
10) Express the right of JKI to remove posts it determines to be harmful to the community at its own discretion.
Agreed. This is in, I dislike the obvious but it is short.
Harassment
Agreed.
I have access to the actual rules that we used to address these issues, and could easily modify them to apply here. But I am not sure if I am in that position. I think we need a formal agreement, by the board I assume, before anything is actually formulated. Regardless, I hope the above gets us on the right track.
At this point let’s wait until my first draft and we can incorporate any omissions you see or tweak the language and then we can go from there. These types of actions get included in my officer’s report to the Board. The directors are free to participate in the formation of these policies, which is one of the reasons we’re talking about it here and not in email. ;-) Unfortunately, Ken (airassult), who has expressed the most interest, is away for a bit.
airassault101User is Offline

Posts:321


10/22/2007 10:34 AM  
Posted By admin account on 10/08/2007 3:22 AM

It is usually the case that you can tell the situations a group has faced by reading their rules. Thanks for the post.

 

Yeah it is a Debate community..go figure..lol

 



"Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
--Ronald Reagan
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Information > Site Announcements > Projects: Site and Forum Policies.



ActiveForums 3.7

  
forums panel

 Page generated in 0.1406295 seconds.
Terms Of Use    Privacy Statement
Copyright (c) 2012 Jericho-Kansas
This site seeks to promote Jericho and neither intentionally or otherwise makes any claims to the intellectual property of others.
Specifically including, but not limited to: CBS / Paramount Entertainment, Junction Entertainment or any of the partners.
Any material produced or referred to on this website is for a nonprofit educational purpose within the scope of 17 U.S.C. § 107.